Counseling Psychology vs. Clinical Psychology

"Do you want an original answer to this question?


Yes No

Counseling Psychology vs. Clinical Psychology
In this three- to four-page paper (1,050 – 1,400 words, excluding title page and references), compare and contrast the primary goals and roles of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist. As you expound on similarities and differences in each of these areas, consider how their perspectives on treatment and treatment settings inform these similarities and differences. Lastly, identify which professional association each practitioner would most likely be affiliated with, then compare and contrast the two codes of ethics. Be sure in your analysis to trace ethical differences back to contrasts that you noted earlier in your paper. Also, support your facts with citations from the week’s readings and at least two peer-reviewed sources from the University of the Rockies library.
Point Value: 8 Points
Assignment Rubric
Description: Counseling Psychology vs. Clinical Psychology In this three- to four-page paper (1,050 – 1,400 words, excluding title page and references), compare and contrast the primary goals and roles of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist. As you expound on similarities and differences in each of these areas, consider how their perspectives on treatment and treatment settings inform these similarities and differences. Lastly, identify which professional association each practitioner would most likely be affiliated with, then compare and contrast the two codes of ethics. Be sure in your analysis to trace ethical differences back to contrasts that you noted earlier in your paper. Also, support your facts with citations from the week’s readings and at least two peer-reviewed sources from the University of the Rockies library.
Total Possible Score: 8.00
Compare and contrast the primary goals of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist.
Total: 1.60
5 – Comprehensively compares and contrasts the primary goals of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist, insightfully linking this to his or her perspectives on treatment and treatment settings.
4 – Effectively compares and contrasts the primary goals of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist, linking this to his or her perspectives on treatment and treatment settings.
3 – Adequately compares and contrasts the primary goals of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist.
2 – Presents some comparisons and contrasts between the primary goals of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist.
1 – A comparison and contrast is not evident regarding the primary goals of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist.
Compare and contrast the primary roles of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist.
Total: 1.60
5 – Comprehensively compares and contrasts the roles of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist, insightfully linking this to his or her perspectives on treatment and treatment settings.
4 – Effectively compares and contrasts the roles of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist, linking this to his or her perspectives on treatment and treatment settings.
3 – Adequately compares and contrasts the roles of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist.
2 – Presents some comparisons and contrasts between the roles of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist.
1 – A comparison and contrast is not evident regarding the roles of a clinical psychologist and a counseling psychologist.
Compare and contrast the ethical codes of clinical and counseling psychologists.
Total: 1.60
5 – Presents a thorough comparison and contrast between the ethics codes of clinical and counseling psychologists that is based on the codes presented by their respective leading professional groups, and strongly grounded comparisons between their goals and roles are also contrasted in this paper.
4 – Provides a strong comparison and contrast between the ethics codes of clinical and counseling psychologists that is based on the codes presented by their respective leading professional groups, and grounded comparisons between their goals and roles are also contrasted in this paper.
3 – Presents an adequate comparison and contrast between the ethics codes of clinical and counseling psychologists that is based on the codes presented by their respective leading professional groups, and somewhat grounded comparisons between their goals and roles are also contrasted in this paper.
2 – An incomplete comparison and contrast between the ethics codes of clinical and counseling psychologists that might not be based on the codes presented by their respective leading professional groups is provided.
1 – A comparison and contrast between the ethics codes of clinical and counseling psychologists was not evident.
Writing and Organization
Total: 1.60
5 – Demonstrates exemplary clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, flawless mechanics, and precise APA formatting.
4 – Demonstrates effective clarity and organization. The paper contains a well-articulated thesis statement, proper mechanics, and correct APA formatting.
3 – Demonstrates adequate clarity and organization. The paper contains a clear thesis statement, adequate mechanics, and mostly correct APA formatting.
2 – Demonstrates some clarity and organization. The paper contains an unclear thesis statement, poor mechanics, and improper APA formatting.
1 – Lacking clarity and organization. The paper lacks a thesis statement, effective mechanics, and proper APA formatting.
Research
Total: 1.60
5 – Demonstrates exemplary critical analysis of the research materials. The student comprehensively uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
4 – Demonstrates effective critical analysis of the research materials. The student fully uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
3 – Demonstrates adequate critical analysis of the research materials. The student adequately uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
2 – Demonstrates some critical analysis of the research materials. The student partially uses varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.
1 – Lacking critical analysis of the research materials. The student fails to use varied, scholarly, relevant, and current resources to inform analysis, evaluation, problem-solving, and decision-making.