Posts

Identifies one organization working to improve global health but does not provide discussion regarding their role

NURS 4225 Forum Grading Rubric Module A

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Competent Substantial Areas for Improvement

Unsatisfactory Comments/Feedback

Content

Identifies more than one organization working to improve global health. In- depth discussion describing their role.

Identifies one organization working to improve global health. Discusses their role.

Identifies one organization working to improve global health but does not provide discussion regarding their role

Organization identified does not work to improve global health

No organization identified

 

8 points 7 points 6 points 5 points 0 points Identifies more

than two determinants of health

Identifies two determinants of health

Identifies two determinants of health, but one is not a determinant

Identifies one determinant of health

No determinant of health identified

 

8 points 6 points 5 points 4 points 0 points In-depth

discussion of how the determinants of health impact the developing world and which sustainable development goal (SDG) these determinants correlate with

Discusses how the chosen determinants of health impact the developing world and which sustainable development goal (SDG) these determinants correlate with

Minimal discussion on how the determinant of health impacts the developing world and which sustainable development goal the determinants correlate with

Neglects to discuss one: either how the determinant of health impacts the developing world OR which sustainable development goal (SDG) the determinants correlate with

No discussion on how the determinant of health impacts the developing world or which sustainable development goal the determinants correlate with

 

 

 

8 points 6 points 5 points 4 points 0 points Includes a

description of more than two targets for the identified sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the target deadline of meeting the SDGs

Includes a description of two targets for the identified sustainable development goals (SDGs) and the target deadline of meeting the SDG

Includes a description of one target for the identified sustainable development goal (SDG) and the target deadline of meeting the SDG

Neglects to discuss one: either the target for the identified sustainable development goal (SDG) or the target deadline of meeting the SDG

No discussion on the target for the identified sustainable development goal (SDG) or the target deadline of meeting the SDG

 

8 points 7 points 5 points 4 points 0 points Posting is at

least 250 words in length

Posting is between 200- 250 words in length

Posting is between 150- 199 words in length

Posting is between 100-149 words in length

Posting is less than 100 words in length

 

8 points 7 points 5 points 4 points 0 points Engagement Engages in discussion through use of thoughtful replies to at least one peer posting. Posting meets stated length requirement (100 words). “Good job” or “I agree” is not appropriate response.

More than required number of replies to peers in a thoughtful, reflective, and respectful manner. Posting is longer than 100 words

Reply meets objective(s) with accurate and relevant information. Required number of replies to peers. Posting is 100 words

Reply meets objective(s) with minimal information. Required numbers of replies are met. Replies add minimal information or knowledge. Posting is between 75 and 100 words

Reply poorly meets objective(s) with no evidence relevant to the topic. Paraphrases what other students have said without adding additional information or knowledge. Posting is between 50 and 74 words

Reply does not meet objectives relevant to the topic. No replies to any peer postings.

<or> Reply is clearly disrespectful. <or> Posting is less than 50 words

 

15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 0 points

 

 

Evidence Ideas are supported by student conducted research using 2 references.

Utilized more than assigned number of sources (more than 2 sources), and all sources are peer-reviewed scholarly sources.

Utilized assigned number of sources (2 sources); both are peer- reviewed

Utilized assigned number of sources (2 sources) One source was not peer-reviewed

Omitted one source from the required number of sources for assignments (1 source).

No scholarly sources used for initial post or student reply.

 

15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 0 points

Scholarly Presentation

Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs. No errors

Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs with no more than three total errors.

Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs with no more than six total errors

Thoughts are organized in paragraphs with no more than nine total errors

Twelve or more total errors.

 

15 points 13 points 11 points 8 points 0 points APA Style Citations/References

No errors

No more than three APA formatting error noted

No more than six errors No more than nine errors Twelve or more errors.

 

15 points 13 points 11 points 8 points 0 points

LACK of INFORMATION:

Faculty may assign a score of 0 to any or all of the grading rubric columns for lack of meeting any of the above objectives.

PLAGIARISM:

Plagiarism is considered cheating and is a violation of academic integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment.

LATE ASSIGNMENTS:

Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero).